tagsmith.org

One constant through the many evolutions of Internet platforms is the fickleness of human beings, especially when asked to make quick decisions.  Successful products have been driven by the combination of the “right” feature set, clarity in purpose, and most importantly, the vibrant nature of communities and how accessible they are to the user.

Indeed, social media users have gone from having options limited by the technical feasibility of what they are trying to accomplish, to having been left with a barrage of decisions to make about what, how, and with who they socialize their content. They’re running into too many choices of types and places to share their content.  And, increasingly, they’re also running into one parameter that’s impossible to change – the number of hours in the day.

So, what’s starting to happen? People, especially early adopters and power users, are taking time away from the “shopping mall” social networks — Facebook and Twitter, for purposes of this discussion — where people can conceivably get anything they want, but have to do a lot of filtering and sorting and following and set up.  Instead, they are starting to turn towards specialized niche social networks to get one type of content that may be most properly appealing to them.

Compare to a real-world scenario: let’s say if you’re a marathon runner, and are looking for a new pair of shoes.  You may be fine going to Target, because they sell sneakers, but their selection probably isn’t aimed at you.  You could try a Foot Locker, and you may have better luck, but you may be out of luck if you have flat feet, or a high arch, or need width.  At the end of the day, you’re probably going to go to a store where they have people who can share their expertise with running and know how to fit you best for shoes.  Now if you knew that ahead of time, wouldn’t you go to the specialty store first?

To me? The Target for your content is Facebook, the Foot Locker is Twitter, and the specialty stores? I’d wager them as Pinterest, Instagram, Foursquare and Tumblr.

I think that Facebook’s problem has become trying to be too many things to too many people and Twitter has always struggled with people who are new to the service understanding the ecosystem.  As Twitter and Facebook start to move their ad products public, it is in their best interest to have users share as much content as possible because it allows them the space to insert ads into the content stream.   And this is, the last holy grail of social advertising, and why these niche networks will continue to succeed – it’s an area the “shopping malls” don’t want to play in anymore.  In a quantity vs quality comparison, on a per piece of content basis, quantity almost never wins.

Why are these niche networks appealing? I think it’s because the decision set has been limited, the options to act have been filtered, the context and actions are clear, and the complexity has been largely removed, and the onus is on creativity and curation.  (I’d be lying if anyone ever said to me, “man, you have an amazing Facebook page”).  Here are five reasons why I think niche networks are starting to win some users away:

1. There are limited explicit options about what and how to share. On Instagram, you’re sharing photographs with a quick way to customize.  With Foursquare, you’re telling people where you are and who you’re with.  With Pinterest, you’re telling people what you want.  With Tumblr, you’re giving a very limited set of options to share your content, and encourage to keep it short and to the point.   It’s a classic web design tenet – don’t make the user think too much, and they will be more likely to do something.

2. The action is both spontaneous and lasting. At point of creation or curation, the user decision set is limited, often reactionary, doesn’t take a lot of effort and all take care to make your content broadcast able to the audience that you want, and store it for easier review and curation. 

3.  Each action builds towards a collection of content that you can control and edit at any time. Facebook is certainly trying to do this with Timeline, but the daunting task of reviewing and curating content prior to the middle of 2011 is too much for many long time users who don’t want the stress of trying to figure out who the audience is.  There is emotional and archival value in your Pinboards, or your Tumblr blog or your Instagram stream.  Your Foursquare check-in history reminds you of where you where and what you did both on a global scale, and every time you check-in.   If you choose to go further, all of these services have a secondary system for organizing your content via tags (Tumblr, Instagram), or through groupings (boards and tips and lists), but you are under no obligation to use them.  You’re building your own unique canvas – you’re creating something to last. 

4.  Your collection is much likely to be about one thing, or related sets of things. I’ve seen Pinterest boards about everything from shoes, to fashion, to best football teams, to memes, Tumblrs about everything from Kim Jung Il, to one featuring the same picture of Full House star Dave Coulier.  Foursquare reminds you that you’re really into movie theaters, Apple stores, pizza joints or karaoke bars by awarding you leveled badges based on your activity there.  Instagram photo streams capture the eye of the photographer and often revolve around the things they like to shoot.

5. There is a built-in community online built around content discovery. If you’re new to these communities, there are a host of people who can show you the way to best utilize these tools, either implicitly or explicitly, and thus make it easier to discover people with like interested.   Discovery tools allow the random serendipity that makes social media great to connect people across shared content interests.

The explosive growth of Pinterest, Instagram, Foursquare and Tumblr are no longer something marketers can ignore.   And remember, user choice always wins; for every Facebook, Twitter and Foursquare, there is a Friendster, Pownce and Gowalla.

So what’s a marketer to do with these new channels? Stay tuned for my talk at Social Fresh East, and a wrap-up summary soon after in case you can’t be there in person.

Excited to be sharing news of my Social Fresh conference debut at Social Fresh East on February 7th in Tampa, FL! I’m honored to be sharing the stage with an esteemed group of social media stars including folks from eMarketer, Nordstrom, Radio Shack and Argyle Social, amongst others.

I’ll be talking about fragmentation in social networks capping off the conference’s second day on February 7th:

Facebook will continue to be the king of social networks for a while, but consumers are still spending an increasing amount of time on more and more social networks. Niche social networks like Instagram, Pinterest, Foursquare, Tumblr and other just to name a few. How does this affect today’s marketer? What skills are needed to maintain a community over so many platforms and media channels?

Hope to see you many of you there! To learn more about the conference and buy tickets, click here.

UPDATE: Voting has opened! Vote for me here!

UPDATE 2: Voting has ended.  Thank you all for your support – excited by my 9th place out of 20 – only 7 votes from the top 5!

By some miracle of the Internets, I got nominated for a seat on the NY Tech Meetup Board of Directors.   I figured, might as well embrace it.  Here is my campaign statement:

I am honored to be joining this esteemed group of nominees in running for the NYTM board and thank the New York Technology community for this opportunity.

My goal is both simple and complicated — to make New York the best place for technology firms and companies to open up shop and to continue to develop the talent pool that is growing here.  I am a veteran of the first Silicon Alley boom and bust, and remember when it wasn’t such a great place to find a job or start a company, and I’d love to make sure that we never get back there.

My platform is to focus on evangelizing the quality of technical education through non-profits, workspaces, workshops, along with credit-bearing courses at educational institutions across New York City.  Sharing and teaching the skills necessary to compete in today’s digital economy will help to foster and protect the community we have built, and give the next generation the opportunities they will need to change the world.  We all win when we are all influencers, leaders and teachers.

New York is the greatest city in the world, with the greatest people, and together we can work together to make a difference for ourselves, new members of the community, and the world at large through sharing our skills, minds and hearts.

Learn more about the NY Tech Meetup here, see the other candidates here, and be ready to vote for me starting on December 5 at 12:01a until 3pm ET on December 20, 2011.

RIP SJ. And thanks.

As you may have heard, there’s been a bit of a kerfuffle around Tumblr’s Fashion Week plans and perceived (or actual) favoritism and treatment of particular brands and industries (along with developers, but that’s a different story)

As summarized by Mashable’s talented style / design editor Lauren Indvik on her Tumblr:

The company is asking, in some cases, for sums upwards of $100,000 and CPMs as high as $70 (compare that to a nytimes.com front page takeover at a CPM of $2 to $3) for sponsorships during New York Fashion Week.

Among other things, marketers were upset that they were being asked to hand over $10,000 to host a private event with the 16 bloggers Tumblr is sending to FW (plus actual hosting expenses), when last year they were asked politely to do it for free. Mind, it’s not exactly customary for brands to pay for journalists to come to their events.

I invite you to read her story for more background – but wanted to add some thoughts of my own here (as I did on my reblog of her post)

I think the biggest problem with this whole situation, and indeed social media marketing, is this egalitarian belief that all content is created equal and should be weighted with the same respect. It isn’t, and probably never will be. Years of AdWords, AdSense and targeted display ads have proven ad much. But, now as it starts to come to social, the model gets messier – the product packages are still in their first “let’s throw this against a wall and see what sticks”.

The value proposition being presented with the package partnerships are indeed totally ridiculous, but sadly, I think you’re going to see social media service providers decide explicitly (in this case) or the marketplace (implicitly through bid prices on social media ad products like Promoted Tweets and Like ads) which content is more valuable simply based on which demographic it appeals to.

This has been happening for years on the traditional content side to meet advertiser and business needs – social networks monetizing their own content creators is just another example of this.

The *execution* if this process in SM however, clearly leaves a lot to be desired as what products can be built around these demographic needs is still an open question (see also Twitter’s struggles with an ad model).

But it will be a Wild West of a marketplace until companies can concretely define the value of social and providers can provide products at a fair market value.